One of the many projects occupying my time these days (and most of my life) – Where did civilization truly originate, and what is our full story? Since I was 11 years old, I never found the “Sumerian first” concept made any sense if you understand global archaeology, mythology, or archaeoastronomy at a functional level. I’m using this post as a placeholder for curious readers who might refer back over the coming months for more updates on this ongoing quest for knowledge.
I’m currently working on composing my research on this topic, and have made the decision to start releasing unfinished notes in order to get at least some amount of content out for presentation. I hope readers will forgive the incomplete state of the work and know that I have hundreds of pages of written material that will be forthcoming as soon as I’m able to stop my research long enough to compose it all into deliverable format. I have learned to embrace my mental nature which allows me to spend countless hours writing, researching, and discussing a wide variety of subject matter, but sharing my time across multiple subjects and works does mean that I can’t publish any one work as quickly as I’d like. I will do my best to spend a few minutes each day to release small bits of my work for my friends to enjoy, and I expect at least 1 or 2 of my books will be complete in the next 12 months, as well as a few substantial research papers.
So stay tuned 🙂
Regarding my OHC Project, here are the high points at present:
While I’ll do my best to drop references into my notes as I publish them here, it just takes too much time to go hunt down things I read years ago, obscure books I may not have in front of me as I’m typing, etc. So please feel free to double check my work on your own and I’ll try to provide bread crumbs to follow at the very least. If I’m speculating, I’ll tell you. If I feel strongly about something, I’ll tell you why. There’s no agenda here but discovery and exploration of Truth, and that’s all readers will get from me. My best attempt at Truth, working with the evidence I have.
It’s my view that in the absence of established truth, speculating about possibilities is totally fine, as long as this speculation doesn’t hinder my ability to conduct objective research and form objective opinions. I call these speculations “placeholders”. If I believe a giant flying spaghetti monster raised Africa out of the sea a billion years ago, and it gives me some framework to form working hypotheses, that’s great. I don’t believe speculating hurts anything, as long as you admit it as such and don’t let it mislead you or impart your judgement when considering new information. Therefore, I rank my points and views on a numerical scale, based on how certain I am of a given view, or how well-evidenced I feel it is. That way, detractors can say what they will about some of the ideas I put forth, but no one can ever say I wasn’t open about the strength of my claims. Some will be very strong and some won’t – and I’m absolutely fine with that, as I feel any open-minded researcher should be.
For example, a “V3 theory” (by my own “validity scale”) should have 3 correlating disciplines supporting the proposition. Within each discipline should be multiple sound data points in the affirmative. See below:
Theory: There is a connection between peoples of the South Pacific and the American Southwest. Specifically, I believe they are connected in that they have come from a common ancestor civilization thousands of years ago that was wiped out in some sort of disaster – most likely a flood of some sort, possibly caused by a volcanic eruption, earthquake, comet impact, or combination thereof.
Exhibit 1: Linguistics – There are at least a dozen words I’ve found in the languages of indigenous peoples from the American southwest that are shared with Hawaiian, Samoan, Polynesian, Maori, and other cultures of the western Pacific, including the Japanese. (There may be more, but the similarities in pronunciation and meanings of so many words I had translated were convincing enough that I didn’t feel further examination was necessary at this point. Translating takes time I could better spend on other work, and the point is to establish enough of a platform to continue a line of research. If I come up empty-handed at the next level of research, the data or conclusions that got me to that point was probably bad, and in this way, again, speculation proves not to be the devil, but a valuable scientific tool. Regarding the validity of these data points, I feel I should be clear about something here, which applies to all my research: Just one or two words in common would hardly catch my attention, although I would store that as a level 1 data point in the back of my mind, in case I came across more later.)
Exhibit 2: Mythology – The aforementioned indigenous American tribes almost all share mythologies of their ancestors coming from the west, across the Pacific Ocean, following a great deluge (flood).
Exhibit 3: Culture/Traditions – Pending – While I’m fairly well-versed on the cultures of most native American peoples, I’m not so knowledgable on cultures of the South Pacific. I’m working with some friends who have more knowledge on this and will have an update soon.
Exhibit 4: Archaeology – I’ve personally visited several archaeological sites around the American Southwest and have observed symbols in petroglyphs and cave art that are identical to those of other sites of deep antiquity around the world. There are too many to list here, but eventually I’ll have pictures up with explanations. It’s also worth mentioning, though not game-changing, that massive pyramids and other megalithic architecture are being found around the south Pacific, predating those of the Mayans to the east across the Pacific. The similarities between these structures are many, and I think at least make them worthy of consideration as evidence of a human connection between the hemispheres.
SERVICE INTERRUPTION: Going to publish this and run to lunch. Will resume this afternoon.
- Looking into the Nordic dispersement idea outlined by the Bock Saga and more or less endorsed by Thor Heyerdahl and others. This is a side item for me at present, but I’m very interested in the Bock Saga, mainly due to the usage of linguistic sound systems to pass on information. The Saga also demonstrates an intriguing use of linguistic morphology that I think warrants investigation. Unfortunately, it’s virtually impossible to get much info on it outside Jim Chesnar’s youtube videos.
- Consuming every Manly P. Hall book and lecture I can get my hands on to better understand ancient wisdom traditions and ties to modern science and architecture. Cross-referencing everything I find with 25+ years of my own independent research in the field and finding astounding parallels.
- Reading every translation I can find of the Emerald Tablets of Thoth, which have been very impressive to say the least.
- Linguistic similarities between different, supposedly unrelated cultures. Specifically Egypt and Native Americans. (Thoth pronounced “Tay-ho-tay” or “Tee-hu-tee” I believe is connected with Teotehuacan, the city of Quetzlcoatl, the Mayan god that is almost indisputably the same entity as Egyptian Thoth. Using imagery and linguistic morphology, this seems plainly obvious to me). Also the native word “peyote”, the plant of wisdom, which again sounds almost identical to “tay-ho-tay”, the egyptian god of wisdom. This kind of thing is fascinating to me and I have several pages of such linguistic ties.